In the first game Geoff eagerly grabbed the Parthians against which I fielded some Arabs. The battle looked set to be camels vs cataphracts.
I defended, and placed a number of areas of dunes to facilitate the movement of my mounted, whilst hampering that of the Parthians.
The Parthians advanced, but some of their cataphracts fell to accurate Arab archery.
Geoff remembered that light horse can march move, and suddenly slipped a pair of horse-archer elements into my rear to threaten my camp.
My archers destroyed a light horse element, putting me 2-0 up. Seeing his hillmen allies still in a column, I rushed some slingers and light cavalry to hit them front a flank; a win would give me the game. I didn't win.
Meanwhile my cavalry general rushed to block the movement of the horse-archers in my rear, and got surrounded for his trouble.
He fought off one of the Parthian elements, destroying it, then turned on the other, with support from the camel scouts attacking out of the dunes in which they were hiding. With the loss of that element, the Parthian army broke, giving the Arabs a 4-0 victory. The main lines never engaged.
For our second game, Geoff took the Early Imperial Romans, whilst I went for the Meroitic Kushites. Against the odds the Romans defended, leaving the Kushites advancing along what turned out to be a dried-up stream towards some inconsequential fields.
The Kushite general, resplendent on his elephant, led a flanking force along the opposite bank of the stream.
The Romans turned some of their army to oppose it. I got a bit overenthusiastic, and advanced the force too far before the rest of the army advanced in support.
Discovering the river was no obstacle, the Kushites attacked. Their general came under potentially deadly artillery fire.
He sought safety in close combat, taking on some legionaries.
Unfortunately with the rest of the Kushite army still ambling up in support, the Romans could give him their full attention. But this Kushite commander was made of the right stuff, and held off the attacks. Meanwhile a significant chunk of the Roman army was holding off the rest of the Kushite flanking move.
The main Kushite force finally moved up.
The Romans did a bit of reorganisation.
And the Kushite general survived another potentially deadly attack.
The Kushite and Roman infantry was now hotly engaged. On the far Kushite left their archers were failing to make an impact on the auxiliary infantry.
The Romans fighting the elephants were being pushed back into their own army now, with fatal results.
The turning point: the Kushite cavalry attacked the Roman artillery, destroying it, whilst skirmishing archers destroyed the Romans' auxiliary horse-archers. The Romans were now 3 elements down.
On the Kushite left, some of their archers fell to a push by the auxilia.
But it wasn't enough; the Kushite cavalry drove into the Roman rear and in the confusion some auxiliary cavalry was lost, giving the Kushites a 4-1 victory.
This previously unscheduled session of DBA is my final entry for that game in the Six By Six Challenge as well
Gary, Peter, Daniel and Caesar continued their Maurice campaign. I'd be up for this as well, but the rules really require an even number of players, so we need an A.N.Other to take part as well. Here are a few pictures of their games. Firstly Caesar's French against Peter's Austrians. Peter has adopted a massed army approach in the campaign, opting for no national advantages.
Gary had originally used Prussians, but in this round he dropped them in favour of his newly-painted Ottomans. And they *are* gorgeous. They fought Daniel's Russians.
I realise now I failed to get any pictures of the Ottoman irregular cavalry and infantry (and there's a lot of it), but I hope this picture of some of their artillery will make up for it.
Superb photograph as ever - it really does justice to the standard of painting on view last night!
ReplyDeleteGreat report and pics. That Kushite general deserves to have a monument built in his honour!
ReplyDeleteNice work.
ReplyDeleteInteresting to have the river running from player edge to player edge in the DBA game, sort of dividing it into two battles.
Geoff placed the river, but I got to choose the edge I entered from. I didn't fancy either trying to defend a river-line quite close to my base-edge, nor did I fancy attacking Romans across one, so I opted to move along the river. As it was, it turned out to be a paltry river, with essentially no effects on combat or movement.
DeleteAh okay, so it wasn't as dramatic as it looked then.
DeleteIt could have been; the nature of a river isn't diced for until someone tries to cross it. It could have been steep-sided and really difficult to negotiate. And that would have made for a very different game. I was hoping for it actually, as it would have trapped the Roman light cavalry on the board-edge side, where the troops I had there could finish them off. The aim was to then pin the Romans with my foot whilst crossing into his flank and rear.
DeleteGotcha, that's really interesting actually. Kind of a terrain fog of war.
DeleteIt's been a feature of DBA for a while, and DBM to I think. A 19th century set, Principles of War expanded it to all terrain, with the effects of woods, rivers, steep hills and other rough going not being tested for until a unit tried to enter them.
DeleteVery nifty.
DeleteI had a similar idea a million years ago for FAD but never quite got it to work well.
Basically when you entered a given feature the first time, you'd roll to see if there was anything unusual about it, like unexploded ordnance, easier or harder to move through, better cover etc.